EdTech Product Development

Custom EdTech Product Development, Governed by Design

Every product is governed by your design vision and built to meet the compliance & security frameworks, data governance standards and long term reliability your organization is accountable for.

250k+
Learners Reached
6
International Compliance and Security Frameworks
10+
Regions of Software Delivery
01
Requirements Mapping and FERPA, GDPR Compliance
We Begin With the People and the Obligations

Before any design work begins, we identify who the product must serve and what it is accountable for delivering. This includes the legal and regulatory obligations that apply, such as FERPA and GDPR, which shape the product from its foundation rather than being addressed after the fact.

✓
Every category of user is mapped, from administrators to learners
✓
Legal and data privacy obligations are identified at the outset
✓
Institutional goals are translated into a defined, testable set of capabilities
Requirements Map
AdministratorsRoles and permissions defined
✓
InstructorsWorkflows mapped
✓
LearnersJourneys mapped
✓
Data obligationsFERPA · GDPR
Capabilities defined
72%
02
System Architecture and SCORM, xAPI, LTI Interoperability
We Plan for Integrity Across Every Layer

Once the requirements are defined, we design how the product will function. It is built to integrate with the systems an institution already operates, using recognised learning data standards such as SCORM, xAPI and LTI.

✓
Controlled access governed by role, so information reaches only those authorised to see it
✓
Support for standard methods of exchanging learning data between systems
✓
A defined boundary between what artificial intelligence may recommend and what a person must decide
Integrations connected
SCORM content packagesConnected
xAPI learning recordsConnected
LTI tool launchConnected
Role-based access controlEnforced
AI recommends · Person decidesBoundary set
03
Validation, Deployment and Knowledge Transfer
We Validate Before Launch and Prepare Your Team to Lead

The product is built in stages, with validation at each one, so issues are identified early rather than after deployment. Once live, we train your staff so the institution can operate the system independently.

✓
Validation is completed well before your team encounters a working version
✓
Staff are trained to operate and maintain the system without ongoing dependence on us
✓
Every action the system takes is recorded, preserving a complete account of its use
Validation passed at every stage
Stage 1 · Core workflowsValidated
Stage 2 · IntegrationsValidated
Stage 3 · DeploymentLive
Staff training and handoverComplete
Audit log · every action recordedActive
Our expertise

Skills Modeling, AI Governance and Security Engineering

Sound engineering is necessary but not sufficient. Building education technology responsibly requires an understanding of how learning, skills and evidence relate to one another.

01

Competency-Based Learning and Skills Taxonomy Design

We break down what a learner needs to achieve into defined, measurable components, commonly referred to as competencies and micro-skills. This structure allows a product to track progress with precision and to connect that progress to verifiable evidence, rather than self-reported claims.
02

Adaptive AI With Human-in-the-Loop Governance

Our AI components can recommend a next step, identify a gap in a learner's competencies, or flag a submission for review. They do not make the final determination. A person reviews and approves anything that becomes an official record or credential, and that boundary is fixed by design.
03

ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II Security Architecture

Every product we build is governed by clear rules for access, data storage and protection. We design to ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II standards from the earliest architectural decisions, not as a measure introduced before launch.
★★★★★
4.9
200+ reviews · 40+ institutions · 3 continents
What placement teams say —

Real results. Real voices.

★★★★★
Public University

“The real shift was catching problems 90 days out, not after a student had already bombed three interviews. We went from 61% to about 82% placed that season. I stopped dreading the March board meeting.”

RP
Rajesh Pillai
Director of Placements
Public University, Abu Dhabi, UAE
★★★★★
Private University

“We'd had a rough year, recruiters kept skipping our drive after too many no-shows. Once we started sending shortlists that actually matched the JD, they came back, and conversion held with fewer visits.”

LK
Layla Al Khalifa
Placement Coordinator
Private University, Riffa, Bahrain
★★★★★
TPO

“Won't pretend it was magic. Took two full seasons to go from 52% to 81%, same staff, no new hires. What helped was knowing who needed a nudge in week 3, not week 11 when it's too late to fix anything.”

MS
Michael Santos
TPO
St. Joseph Polytechnic, Manila, Philippines
★★★★★
Multi-Campus Network

“Every campus had its own spreadsheet and its own definition of 'placement ready'. Getting five deans to agree on one scorecard took more meetings than I'd like to admit, but now I can compare campuses properly.”

NA
Noura Al-Otaibi
Head of Career Services
Nexus University Network, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
★★★★★
Specialized Institute

“We run on a government budget so 'buy more training hours' was never really on the table. What changed was knowing which two or three skills were actually costing us offers, not guessing with a generic workshop.”

AS
Ahmed Al-Sulaiti
Placement Officer
Specialized Institute, Doha, Qatar
★★★★★
TPO

“Every accreditation cycle I'd lose three weeks copy-pasting numbers into whatever format our reviewers wanted that year. Last cycle I exported the report in an afternoon. My assistant didn't believe how long it used to take.”

RH
Rebecca Hughes
Placements Lead
Thornfield College, Manchester, UK
★★★★★
Recruiter

“Not every hire is perfect now, but we used to burn through five technical rounds to land one decent candidate. It's closer to two or three these days. Real time back for my team, fewer awkward hiring-manager calls.”

WT
Wei Ling Tan
Talent Acquisition Lead
Meridian Tech Solutions, Singapore
★★★★★
Student

“For months I thought I just wasn't good in interviews. Turned out my resume was the actual problem and nobody had told me. The report said fix these two things, I did, and had an offer about five weeks later.”

AO
Amara Okafor
Student
B.Sc Computer Science, University of Lagos, Nigeria
★★★★★
TPO Cell

“My committee has a habit of asking for placement numbers I can't back up until offers land. Now I can walk in three months early and show which batch is on track. Doesn't make me popular, but I'm not guessing anymore.”

TR
Thomas Reid
Dean of Placements
Kingsway Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
Speak with our team
Discuss Your EdTech Product Development Requirements
Share what you are trying to build. We will walk you through how we can make your product come to life.
No obligation. A direct conversation about your requirements.